New study in Nature by Lin et al shows how the sea-level rise from the melting Ice Age ice (a total of 120 meters rise) ended thousands of years ago. Until our fossil fuel use started a new phase of rising seas. Graph shows the global mean rate of rise. 🌊 nature.com/articles/s41586-0…

Nov 3, 2025 · 12:11 PM UTC

Replying to @rahmstorf
2 Major interpretation errors 1- The number of points in early holocene cannot spot rapid changes in sea level rise . Do not indicate decadal or centurial changes 2- The increase start in 1850 so 120 years before any significant anthopogenic forcing that start around 1970
3
5
34
It's amazing how responsive sea level is to Global temperatures 👀
There is going to be some gobsmacking SLR in the NEAR future. Climate science has underestimated this, like it did for #xwx weather impacts & warming feedbacks.
1
1
2
Replying to @rahmstorf
Yet 500 year old Mediterranean cliff undercuts, remain at sea level. With no land movement reported in western Anatolia. And Roman ports are left a meter above the current sea level. What sea level rise? Ralph
1
20
Replying to @rahmstorf
Rahmstorf, the current melting began between 1830 and 1850, decades before CO2 levels moved discernibly.
1
20
Replying to @rahmstorf
There are plenty of papers suggesting that CO2 is not the control knob.
13
Replying to @rahmstorf
Really. The ocean hasn't risen on the east coast of the United States of America. It seems like it, but the land is actually sinking. Places like Plymouth Rock haven't changed since the 1600s. This is due to the seduction zone. So I disagree for the last 400 years.
3
1
6
Replying to @rahmstorf
Sea levels haven’t been rising. If they had, every coastal river town in the world, particularly those like Byblos in Lebanon (dates back to 6000 B.C.E) , or London, or Alexandria in Egypt would already be seeing an impact. They aren’t. #ClimateScam
4
7
Replying to @rahmstorf
Are you seriously going to believe or get people to believe that in this warmer Interglacial Period there was no sea level rise until we started burning coal and getting Industrialised? A new study indicates that 8200 years ago, near-global sea levels rose 6.5 meters in a span of just 140 years. This is 470 centimetres per century, 4.7 centimetres per year, during a period when CO2 levels were supposedly only 260 ppm. A new analysis of global sea level rise rates concludes the rising trend was 1.56 mm per year from 1900-2018. This is the same rate as for 1958-2014. indicating there has not been a long-term distinctive change in sea level rise rates in the last 120 years. So the IPCC say that warming can only really be attributed to humans after 1945 as the global economy grew after the war. But the above shows that there really isn't much of a change in sea level rise since the war, as would be expected if humans were adding to the rate with our emissions which have increased greatly in recent times.
2
5
Replying to @rahmstorf
This idiot only responds to blusky posts, which by inference of credibility makes him a scientific nimrod. And why? Because he knows damn well facts will shoot him down in flames, facts he can't debate, but can only puke his rhetoric. facts like below.
5
Replying to @rahmstorf
Sure sure Science
1
4
Replying to @rahmstorf
How could sea-level have "ended" when with or without anthropogenic CO2 we're still warming after that last Ice Age? When do you think the ice stopped melting!?!? Here's a more reasoned look at the science. normanjansen.substack.com/p/…
3
3
Replying to @rahmstorf
The rising seas trend started before the modern fossil fuel era
3
3
Replying to @rahmstorf
Ist das so... 🤔 Ach ja, ihr Boss hat sich gerade von dem Klimawahnsinn verabschiedet. 😉
3
Replying to @rahmstorf
We’re literally moving oceans again after millennia of stability. This time it’s our choice – let’s make better ones! 🌊
2
Replying to @rahmstorf
We are in a interglacial period so the ice will melt also there is no sea level rise Maldives are still there the rich are still buying beach front homes and you can still get a mortgage near the coast or low level land if it was actually real the banks wouldn’t lend you a penny
2
2
Replying to @rahmstorf
Non foreseeable danger to humanity. Gigs over, you can stop now.
2
Replying to @rahmstorf
btw, this study considers specifically one location on Earth - China
1
1
The FreeForm Playground is live! We’re teaming up with @printablescom to challenge makers worldwide! Take our modular hardware and make it your own. Design, print, and share your FreeForm creation for a chance to win a Prusa MK4S Kit, a Cooler Master Custom PC Build, and more. Don’t wait! Submit your entry before the deadline on December 1, 2025. Your build, your rules. 🔗 linkto.cm/FB__FF_Playground
1
14
83
Replying to @rahmstorf
Liar 👍🏼
1
Replying to @rahmstorf
The little ice age ended, we're now in a warming period, you absolute charlatan.
1
Replying to @rahmstorf
Scary stuff... if you don't have a brain.
1
Replying to @rahmstorf
It interesting that you mention the sea level rise as the result of the climate change. The recent sea level rise has been happening at a constant rate since 1850s, well before any CO2 increases or dT were observed. This puts the concept of CO2-driven climate change in doubt.
1
1
Replying to @rahmstorf
Not supported by research from Nils-Axel Mörner, Pamela Matlack-Klein, Maria Assunção Araújo and others.
1
Replying to @rahmstorf
Name one city they had been inundated by rising seas int he last 1000 years.. You're ridiculous.
1
Replying to @rahmstorf
Klimareligion isch over, schon mal von Bill Gates gehört?
1
Replying to @rahmstorf
Illegal offshore sand dredging is the main cause of sea encroachment in vulnerable islands. The US Navy has the satellite photos to prove it! So why is this not being discussed?